CardHolder Services Comments and Complaints--CROOK ALERT!
84
CardHolder Services, Orlando, Florida CROOK ALERT!!
I filed a complaint with the Do Not Call Registry yesterday after receiving ten or twenty apparent robocall telephone solicitations in the past month or so on my home phone and cell phone from a woman named Rachel who purported to represent a suspicious outfit that calls itself CardHolder Services. This organization purports to provide lower interest rates on credit card balances.
After filing the complaint I called the customer service number on a credit card that is operated by JPMorganChase to inquire whether CardHolder Services was affiliated with JPMorganChase. I was informed that CardMember Services was not a JPMorganChase affiliate and, moreover, that CardMember Services was "under investigation." It didn't occur to me to ask why JPMorganChase hadn't alerted its cardholders to the apparent scam or unauthorized activiity being perpetrated by CardHolder or CardMember Services on JPMorganChase cardholders.
A quick Google search on CreditCard Services revealed a number of complaints some of which are linked below. The most interesting article I found was from the Harvard Journal on Legislation entitled The Invisible Hand of Preacquired Account Marketing by Prentiss Cox who is a professor at University of Minnesota Law School. The introduction to the long article describes preacquired account marketing thusly:
Preacquired account marketing is a sales practice that allows companies to charge consumers for services they do not know they ordered and do not use. The practice depends on a seller’s ability to access a consumer’s financial account without the consumer directly providing her account number and other access information to that seller. This flips the power dynamic in the solicitation
process by shifting the burden to the consumer to stop the seller from accessing her account, rather than requiring the seller to ask the consumer for her account information before her account can be charged. This is possible because the seller has paid a financial institution, such as a bank, or another seller who retains consumer account numbers for the right to charge the consumer’s account. Tens of millions of consumers have been affected by this sales practice.
Many of these consumers have diminished mental capacity or struggle with the English language, making it more likely that they will not understand that they are being charged. This Article recommends that state legislatures or the United States Congress adopt the proposed Uniform Consumer Account Control Act, a total ban on preacquired account marketing. Prohibiting this form of marketing is conceptually less difficult than many other areas of consumer protection regulation because the regulatory costs in this situation are almost non-existent. A total ban forces sellers to actually reach an understanding with consumers. Experience has shown that lesser remedies, such as improved disclosures, are insufficient to control rampant consumer misunderstanding. They do not solve the fundamental problem of shifting control of account access from the consumer to the seller in a way that facilitates sorting of consumers into those unaware of account charges.
The article reports that a number of presumably reputable banks and other businesses cooperate in the perpetration of misleading and sometimes fraudulent pre-acquired account marketing schemes. "A large number of consumers have complained to state attorneys general, the Better Business Bureau (“BBB”), and other consumer advocates that the preacquired account marketing practice is deceptive.71 The BBB alone has received thousands of complaints about Affinion Group.72....The companies themselves also receive large numbers of consumer complaints.
The Senate Committee investigation found that the companies “receive millions of calls every year from angry, frustrated consumers” who have discovered their enrollment, and wish to cancel their membership or challenge charges to their accounts.75 Customers contacting the companies “us[e] words like ‘fraud,’ ‘tricked,’ ‘deceptive,’ ‘misleading,’ ‘scam,’ ‘deceitful,’ ‘dishonest,’ ‘betrayed,’ and ‘robbed’ to describe their experiences.”76 Complaints at one referring seller rose to a level that an employee of the company described as “brutal and unprecedented.” State attorneys general have brought several lawsuits against some of the largest banks in the nation for
their roles in preacquired account marketing schemes.78 The first suit against an account issuer was brought against U.S. Bancorp by thirty-nine state attorneys general.79 The suit alleged violations of federal and state laws for U.S. Bancorp’s sharing of bank account numbers and other personal financial data with preacquired sellers.80 State attorneys general also have brought Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices (“UDAP”) actions against the following account issuers for participation in preacquired marketing: Bank One (a multistate lawsuit involving twenty-nine states)81; Fleet Mortgage;82 Citibank (a multistate lawsuit involving twenty-eight states);83 Sears;84 and Chase Manhattan.85 State attorneys general enforcement actions against referring
sellers engaged in preacquired marketing include cases against Tick-etmaster, Time,86 and, more recently, AT&T.87 The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has also filed lawsuits against numerous referring sellers engaging in preacquired marketing with Triad Discount Buying Services.
88 Companies involved in the FTC matter included the following: Premier Club Services, L.L.C.; Premier Marketing Services of America, L.L.C.; Residents Resource Network, L.L.C.; and the Shoppers Edge, L.L.C., among numerous others.89 State attorneys general have repeatedly filed enforcement actions against many preacquired sellers as well. These include cases against Damark (now Provell, Inc.),90 Blitz Media, Inc.,91 BrandDirect Marketing, Inc. (a multistate lawsuit involving the Washington and Connecticut attor-neys general),92 MemberWorks and its successor Vertrue,93 and Trilegiant (a multistate lawsuit involving sixteen states).94"..
The law review article concludes that regulation is needed to curb pre-acquired account marketing. Based on what I've learned through my experience and a little research individuals are well advised to:
1. Beware of unsolicited offers of "free" trial offers of discounts, coupons, services, etc. from retailers like Penney's or Sears, your credit card provider or your bank.
2. Do not give your credit card number or bank account number or Social Security number to any over the telephone or on line unless you are absolutely sure that the request is from a reputable business or organization.
3. Get the name of the individual calling, the name, mailing address and telephone number of the business he or she claims to represent. If there is any reluctance to provide you with this information STOP RIGHT THERE!
4. If you accept an offer be sure to read the fine print and get a clear answer of the amounts that will be charged to your bank account or credit card and the procedure for stopping the charges. TAKE NOTES!
5. Check your bank and credit card statements each month and complain promptly about any charges that you don't understand or don't believe you authorized. In many states if you fail to complain in writing about an error or improper charge on your account within thirty.days, TOUGH LUCK!
Comments are welcome below about your experiences or complaints about CardMember Services, Credit Card Services or similar sources.
The Invisible Hand of Preacquired Accout Marketing by Prentiss Cox in the Harvard Journal on Legislation
- The Invisible Hand of Preacquired Account Marketing
Preacquired account marketing allows companies to charge consumers for services they do not know they ordered and do not use. The practice depends on a sellers ability to access a consumers account without the consumer providing her account number.
11-29-11NYTimes "Telemarketer Abuse Statute Confounds U.S. Supreme Court"
- Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Telemarketer Abuse Cases - NYTimes.com
Justices disagreed on whether lawsuits under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act should be filed in federal or state courts, but they agreed that the law was odd.
3-1-12FreePress--"Debt isn't Real but Harassing Phone Calls Are" Susan Tompor
- Susan Tompor: Debt isn't real but harassing phone calls are | Detroit Free Press | freep.com
On the surface, this consumer alert seems a tad too obvious to be worth repeating. The Federal Trade Commission is warning people that they should not hand over money to pay a debt that they do not owe. Didn't borrow the money? Don't send a check or
Consumer Alert Boston.com on Robo Rachel
- Robo-calling Rachel, leave me alone - Consumer Alert - Boston.com
A lot of those calls come from woman’s voice identifying herself as “Rachel.” In fact, she just called my home and my cell. These calls have been an annoyance for years and appeared to have gone on hiatus after the FTC shut down a massive calling ope
11-23-11NYTimes--"If You Can't Trust Caller I.D."
- Who’s on the Line? Increasingly, Caller ID Is Duped - NYTimes.com
More complaints about “caller ID spoofing” or “call laundering” by telemarketers. "Rachel" is still calling with offers of lower rates on credit card balances. Sonkei allegedly sold robocall services to telemarketers that generated 1000s of complaint
11-23-11NewsRoomMagazine--FTC Goes After Sonkei Communications
- FTC Goes After Sonkei Communications For Evasive Robocalling Services | Newsroom Magazine USA Editio
"Sonkei Communications, Peter J. Turpel, and Joseph Turpel, allegedly sold robocall services to telemarketers offering credit card services, home security systems, and grant programs. Defendants allegedly gave clients the means to hide their identit
Hanging up on Rachel Robo
- Hanging up on Rachel: Robo-calls have been banned, yet the phones keep ringing - DailyFinance
\"Hi. This is Rachel from Cardholder Services.\" It's safe to say that millions of Americans have received a call from Rachel or one of her robo-calling associates...The prime suspect in this calling spree has been DHC Financial Services Group -- a F
ComplaintWire--CardHolder Services is a Phisihing Expedition
- http://complaintwire.org/Complaint.aspx/X7Ulc15FkQD5OwjOXJO-og
503-563-0989 - Also 205-213-0115 - Same as others, it's the old Credit Card Phishing Scam. Message states "Hello, this is Rachel from Cardholder Services. We're calling to inform you about an issue with your credit card. There is no problems with you
921-11BangorDailyNews--Business, Card Member Services or Not?
- Card member services or not? Maine Business Bangor Daily News
Phones have been ringing all over Maine in recent weeks. Every time, the message is the same. This is Rachel from Card Member Services Most readers can probably recite the rest of the message by heart. Rachel is calling to assure you that nothings w
File a Complaint With the Do Not Call Registry
- National Do Not Call Registry
Here is the website where you can file a complaint to the Do Not Call Registry. You may wish also to contact your state's attorney general office.
CardMember Services--Chase Bank Ripoff Report
- Rip-off Report | Cardmember Services, Chase Bank USA, First USA | Complaint Review: 491662
Cardmember Services, Chase Bank USA, First USA WaMu All You Need to Know About Chase Internet
Caller ID--Calls from CardMember Services
- How to deal with unsolicited calls.
I have learned how to deal with these calls. Reporting the number that is on your Caller ID to the FED or your states Attorney General does no good because it is usually either a forged number or it is a number that can not be associated with the ca
Card Services Scam Calls
- Honeypot.net
I got a similar call. My phone rang, caller ID 414-762-2855, Oak Creek, Wi. Recording said press 1 for "info about reducing credit card interest rate." I pressed 1. A man said they deal with different banks... cards, Visa, MC, Discover, AmEx, etc.
From Caller ID--How to Deal with Unsolicited Calls
"I have learned how to deal with these calls. Reporting the number that is on your Caller ID to the FED or your state’s Attorney General does no good because it is usually either a forged number or it is a number that can not be associated with the caller, and therefore cannot be used to identify the real caller.
"You need to get a REAL number that can absolutely identify the caller in order for the FED or your state Attorney General to be able to sue the real culprit. The only way to get that real number is to talk to the caller and turn the tables on him!
"When you get this type of call feign interest. That means that if the recorded message asks you to press 9 then go ahead and press 9 to talk to a live person. While they give you their pitch, keep feigning interest. Sound excited that you may be able to have your interest rate reduced. Keep them talking. If they ask you a question, answer it, but don't answer it truthfully (and NEVER give them your Credit Card number or anything else that is real).
"After a couple minutes you will have them hooked. That is when you have to go to the bathroom, or check the oven, etc. Ask them if you can call them back in a few minutes and get a phone number from them. Chances are they will give you a real number (and their name). Call that number back a minute or two later and ask for the person that you were speaking to. Talk to them just long enough to ensure that you are talking to the same person and that the same conversation is being continued. At that point, tell them that you are on the Do Not Call List and that you want to be placed on their own internal DO NOT CALL list. Also, let them know that you now have a valid phone number to report to your state of the FED.
"I did this a month ago after receiving dozens of calls offering me to reduce my interest rate. When I asked if I could call back I got the number ‘1-866-942-6441’ along with the company name ‘Sapphire Financial’. I called back a minute later and spoke to the same person and the conversation picked up where it left off.
I was able to report all this to my State’s Attorney General and because they have a verified bonafide phone number, the AG can sue the company, which they are in the process of doing so now. Now when they call (and they continue to call) I feign interest so that I can get a verified, bonafide number that can be used to SCREW them both legally and royally
"Until you can get a verified bonafide number, there is nothing that you can do. If you can get a verified, bonafide number, the FED or your state’s Attorney General can do something,
"By the way….If you do feign interest and they don’t give you a number when you ask….just tell them that you will just call 1-866-942-6441 and ask to speak Jennifer Sallies instead. More than likely they will be calling for Sapphire Financials and hearing their real number and the owner’s name will really BLOW their mind."
[From Caller ID Website.]
Scam Checker.com
- CardMember Services Complaint about Multiple Calls
I've received 200 calls from card member services. The recorded message goes something like "hello, this is Rachel" Would you like lower credit card interest rates as low as 6.9%. If so press this number.
Complaintwire--Constant Calls
- card member services complaint - constant calls
recording 3 or 4 times a day im on no calll list
Complaints Board--CardMember Services
- CardMember Services Complaints, Reviews - Scam
CardMember Services Complaints, Reviews: Scam. Products & Services
Honeypot.net Carmember Services Complaint
Here's a Comment from James Jones Who Says He Worked for one of these Credit Companies
I worked a few days for them, it is not a total scam as they can reduce interest rate for consumers that have higher than 17% interest rates, but it is a completely commissioned based company and thus I made no money. We were taught to basically hang up on anyone who asks any questions unless they are really interested in reducing their rates. Anyone else, we hung up. Other than that, I understand they're an automated system that will call anyone and everyone, mostly elderly, and even those on the "do not call list." We just hung up on everyone who did not say yes and hitting the #2 does nothing. There is nothing to stop the calls. We just hang up on any person who didn't sound like they were interested. They do check credit, so it will hit your credit score. They told us that we would make $700-1000 per week. But, when I saw 6 outta 10 making $0 in 3 days, it didn't seem profitable. The sad thing is they advertise the job on craigs list and on magic marker signs on the side of the road. They didn't even look at the application and just said, can you sell this and your hired. Thus, anyone could have access to your private information. Thus, beware.
11-13-11NYTimes--"Robocalls Instigate a Cellphone Fight"
- Rewriting the Law on Automated Cellphone Calls - NYTimes.com
Federal law protects cellphone customers from receiving automated calls without consent, but the government and industry groups want to change what “consent” means.
vote upvote downshareprintflag
- Useful (8)
- Funny
- Awesome (1)
- Beautiful
- Interesting (2)
CommentsLoading...
Who can you trust these days? I travel a lot and check my home number for messages. It is usually some Ahole offering to lower my credit card rate and I can't stop it. Recently my Credit card was compromised by a Florida company. I informed the Credit card company who allowed the charge the following month. After complaining again they cancelled my card and issued another with a different number and say they will reimburse me. Such a pain as I pay so many bills on line. Similar events have caused my Son and my Partner to have new cards issued.
My advice is to read the small print on those tiresome"notices" issued by card issuing banks and ALWAYS check your Credit Card Statements as soon as they arrive with a small tooth comb. Good luck! It is definitely Us against Them in the credit card world. Excellent hub and I hope every one reads it.
Thanks for raising awareness.
Very Useful.
I was a corp trainer for one of the Mega banks, and they allow affiliates to market their goods but have a fine print that the bank itself is not liable for any misinformation. Worse part of it is that they require the customer service dept to make offers and actually have quotas they haave to meet. Trust NO One...nothing is free!!! Good Info Ralph.
These bastards have been calling at least once a week since August - including when I was home recuperating from a hospital stay. Nothing I say or do makes then stop, and I have filled out numerous complaint forms with the feds and the state, yet it continues. I'm beginning to think the Do Not Call registry is the biggest scam of them all since it doesn't work and is not enforced.
The new spin on the scam is that they want your name and phone number to add to "There" do not call list. Then they sell that information to other seedy telemarketers as a confirmed phone number list that they know are working numbers. They have no do not call list. Only better target list they sell since you provided more information.
speaking of card holder services. Those morons just called a few minutes ago-you start yelling at them they say watch your mouth inspite the fact they been going at this since 2007-5yrs is getting old
couldnt agree with you more. One would think after 5 years and hanging up or telling them to get the blank lost they would go away
One of the reasons that the FTC and FCC will not go after Card Holder Services is that it is not a single company scamming the public.
If you think CMS sounds familiar, it is because Bank of America calls their customer service center Card MEMBER Services. CHS is playing on this familiarity.
They are like a franchise. You buy the scam details and then begin calling people from an illegal database.
The number on your caller ID is a call service which is not set up or is set to not receive calls.
The people who you speak with if you press '9' on your phone is someone's private cell phone, and is probably a disposable one at that.
I have been reporting them for years and the FCC and FTC refuse to even reply.
I have found that the only joy I get out of these calls (I get one or more a month, although I have never been tricked by them) is to say extremely rude things to the person to whom I am transferred.
They know that they are breaking the law since they often ask for PIN numbers along with passwords and other sensitive data.
I would love to threaten their lives (just to make sure they get the hint that they should stop trying to scam people) but I haven't. I have, however, told them to get a real job and to stop scamming people (among other, ruder things). I just make sure to wait till they say, "Hello", but to hang up before they can recover their composure.
I hang up with a sigh of happiness and go on with my day.
The "customer rep" doesn't know what your number is since you are a transfer from the robo-dialer.
It's sad that the government isn't doing anything about this, but have some fun with them during the interim.
Great Hub!
I don't even have a credit card and Rachel keeps calling. I am on the DNC list. I've filed numerous complaints with the FTC.
Sonkei Communications, Inc., Peter J. Turpel, and Joseph Turpel sold robocall services to telemarketers offering credit card services, home security systems, and grant procurement programs.
You are wrong in making this statement about Sonkei Communications. Though a complaint has been filed the company does not do robo-calling to consumers and I imagine the case will be dismissed. Sonkei mostly handles multi-medi projects. Also the pics that Mister Deeds has posted are inaccurate. If you search you will find press releases for the company, stating that it is fighting the case. I have to agree that it is a sad thing for anyone who has to deal with this kind of call.
Thanks Mister Deeds. I beleive if you read the complaint the word aledged is in there. There are also press releases out there from our attourny and PR staff expressly stating that we are not involved. It's sad we have to spend money to defend ourselves. what make matters worses some pretty mean, albiet I am sure they are frustrated, people call our firm and hang up repeatedly, impeding our business.
Also, you mention that the FTC could not reach us for comment. to my knowledge they never attempted. You may be referring to a NY times request, but no-one was actually here when they left a message.
Regarding the picture, JOe Turpel's is wrong. Mine is correct as it looks like it was downloaded from a video where I won " The spirit of small business award in 2008." In any event, we are not in the business of doing robo-calls and hope for a swift end to this disruptive complaint.
I appreciate that Mr. Deed. As soon as this hits closure I will be sure to let you and your fellow readers know. We fully respect the law and people right to privacy and have always worked with the highest ethic. We incoporate into our company mission, The 4 WAY TEST from Rotary. 1) Is it the Truth. 2) Is it FAIR to all Concerned. 3) Will it build Goodwill and better friendships. 4) Will it be Benefical to all concerned.
I'll let you know the outcome.
I will do that...but I hear there is a Heather and a Diane out there as well. Be safe and remember every day is a Friday :-)
Pete
Get CONSTANT calls from them--Tonight, asked about getting on the "do not call" list for this company--"Credit Member Services"---guy pretended to have an Indian accent and ask me stupid questions like "do you want to call a cab?"....when I repeated for the 15th time that I wanted to be excluded, he then asked "ma'm, do you have a dildo at home?"













writeronline Level 7 Commenter 8 months ago
A very revealing, yet distressingly unsurprising example, Ralph, of what passes for ethical business practice in the financial services sector, worldwide, these days.
As this lack of ethical/moral standards is in no small part responsible for the Global Financial Crisis/GFC, I think the acronym is missing a key letter - S.
SGFC, as in, Self Generated Financial Collapse.
As far as I can see, most of the people in charge of financial services organisations are robbers. And the rest are thieves.